ABSTRACT
Objective To investigate the positioning errors of head and neck during intensity-modulated radiation therapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Methods Nineteen patients with middle-advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (T2-4N1-3M0), treated by intensity-modulated radiation therapy, underwent repeated CT during their 6-week treatment course.All the patients were immobilized by head-neck-shoulder thermoplastic mask.We evaluated their anatomic landmark coordinated in a total of 66 repeated CT data sets and respective x, y, z shifts relative to their position in the planning CT.ResultsThe positioning error of the neck was 2.44 mm±2.24 mm,2.05 mm±1.42 mm,1.83 mm±1.53 mm in x, y, z respectively.And that of the head was 1.05 mm±0.87 mm,1.23 mm±1.05 mm,1.17 mm±1.55 mm respectively.The positioning error between neck and head have respectively statistical difference (t=-6.58,-5.28,-3.42,P=0.000,0.000,0.001).The system error of the neck was 2.33,1.67 and 1.56 higher than that of the head, respectively in left-right, vertical and head-foot directions;and the random error of neck was 2.57,1.34 and 0.99 higher than that of head respectively.Conclusions In the process of the intensity-modulated radiation therapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, with the immobilization by head-neck-shoulder thermoplastic mask, the positioning error of neck is higher than that of head.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Simulating calculation the dose distribution of the total body irradiation (TBI) with three dimension treatment planning system(3D-TPS ). Materials and Methods: For TBI, the source skin distance(SSD) is 380 cm, field size is 40 cm × 40cm, and collimator angle is 45°. The percent dose depth (PDD) and onset axis ratio (OAR) of the linac accelerator is measured with the big water phantom self-made. In the same radiation condition, the PDD and OAR of water which is simulated calculation with the 3D-TPS is compared with the measurement results to confirm whether the 3D-TPS can calculate the TBI dose distribution. The dose distribution of the human phantom is calculated with 3D-TPS, which is compared and confirmed with the film and TLD measurements. Results: The maximum error of PDD and OAR in the water phantom between the measurements and calculations of 3D-TPS are 3% and 6%. The calculation results of the 3D-TPS is according with the measurement results of the film and TLD approximately. Conclusions: 3D-TPS could simulate calculation the dose distribution for TBI accurately. It is possible to improve more uniform dose for TBI with corresponding compensator for specific patient.